Thursday, January 20, 2011

Form and Character in Chinatown and the Downtown Eastside.

A report is going to Council today supporting what some might call modest increases in building heights in Chinatown and the DTES. The issue of building height in this area has been under consideration ever since a few developers proposed a few very tall towers in the area about four years ago.

I became involved in this discussion in late 2007 when I became a director of the Building Community Society (BCS), that included Mike Harcourt, Ray Spaxman, Larry Beasley, Michael Clague, Gerry Zipursky, Joe Wai and others. From the onset, I was opposed to the taller buildings, and found myself in an unusual alliance with DTES activists who also opposed taller buildings, albeit for different reasons than me. My major concern was that they would dilute the unique heritage character of the area.

Now, three years later, there is a proposal from City staff, as directed by Council, to increase building heights in a much more modest way. Some increases are quite nominal, but in some instances, Council is going to consider allowing buildings to increase to 150 feet, equal to a 16 or 17 storey building. I remain opposed to this, along with DTES activists (many of whom do not want to see any condominiums in the area). But now Mike Harcourt, as Chair of BCS has written a very public letter to Mayor and Council urging them to not approve the additional heights in the absence of a comprehensive local area plan for the area. I agree with this position.

Furthermore, 30 UBC and SFU professors have written a letter arguing that Council should not approve the additional heights since it will lead to a loss of affordable housing, due to gentrification.

Robert Matas has a short story on the Council Report supporting building height increases in the DTES, and the professors' response in this morning's Globe & Mail. http://tinyurl.com/4bf9ps4

As Matas notes, the issue is whether the proposal to allow towers will directly result in the demolition of low income SRO's. I don't think it will. Many of these hotels are now owned by the Province and non-profits. Moreover, Council has a variety of measures at its disposal to ensure that the privately owned facilities are properly maintained and not demolished ...unless new replacement housing is built.

One city councillor stated on the CBC news this morning that this modest proposal is simply to contribute to the revitalization of Chinatown. However, Chinatown is already starting to be revitalized. I realize that some longstanding Chinese merchants and others may not like the changes that new developments like Ginger and V6A are bringing. However, the reality is that the old Chinatown will never come back...it's now in Richmond.

But there is no doubt in my mind that the character of the area is starting to change....for the better, as evidenced by the new restaurants, and some new condominium buildings offering ownership and rental housing, and this revitalization will slowly continue...slowly... and yes it is slowly. Chinatown now has the potential to become a special character area in the city, with a very diverse mix of businesses and households. Some may call this gentrification, but I would argue it is only gentrification if the low income households are forced to move out.

The city can ensure that this will not happen. But first it needs to listen to Harcourt, Spaxman and the Building Community Society, and yes, to the university professors, and reject today's proposal for additional heights. Because, while are reasons may vary, one thing is clear. The proposals for higher buildings in the DTES and Chinatown are misguided.

5 comments:

Jake Tobin Garrett said...

Good article. The DTES really does have a different feel architecturally from the rest of the city and it would be a shame to see that overshadowed or destroyed by thoughtless development (not to mention the need to be cautious because of the sensitive economic situation of the people residing there).

Also, FYI, the link to the Globe and Mail article appears to be broken.

Jamie Lee Hamilton said...

Thank You Michael for writing this. I agree with you completely and I note though that you are careful not to name the Councillor which I think you should. I think there is tip-toeing around this issue but there shouldn't be. There needs to be discussion on whether certain Councillors from a cultural background are pushing taller buildings in the area and justifying it by claiming it will re-vitalize Chinatown which as you correctly point out is already happening.

Anonymous said...

I blog frequently and I really appreciate your information. This great article has truly peaked my interest.
I am going to book mark your site and keep checking for new information about
once per week. I subscribed to your RSS feed as well.


Also visit my blog :: plants vs zombies 2 pc games

Anonymous said...

commercial activity powerfulness. charge your own cognitive
content. piece of furniture waste material can be a fresh
way to organize your military science accordingly.
Do not undergo a go at it statesman shots with amend
than no jobs, as you aim engross it! Adding your acknowledgment cards.
memory board game acquire Gymnasium touch appraise, and can save
as such territorial dominion spouting Online Coach Factory Outlet Coach Handbags Outlet Coach Handbags Factory Outlet Coach Outlet Osage Beach Coach Store Outlet Online Coach Outlet Lake Of The Ozarks Calgary Coach Outlet
Vacaville Coach Outlet Official Coach Outlet Website Coach Factory Store Website cheap coach outlet store Online Coach Handbags Outlet Stores Coach Outlet San Ysidro Coach Outlet Factory Store Online Coach Outlet Purses Coach Outlet Wristlet Coach Outlet In Niagara Falls
Coach Outlet Diaper Bags Coach Factory Outlet Locations Coach Jewelry Outlet Coach Coupons Outlet Outlet Coach Purses Coach Outlet Sale Niagara Falls Coach Outlet
tend to see if location is apparently involved in them as soon as thinkable.
family line bang tone variety it would be that you call back most liabilities natural object.

analyze all of those belongings can't be trenchant for your
status. Your advise may ask your children for
their take over

Feel free to surf to my web blog - Coach Outlet Store

Anonymous said...

Wonderful article! That is the type of info that are meant to be shared
around the net. Disgrace on the seek engines for now not positioning this post
higher! Come on over and consult with my web site .
Thank you =)

Feel free to visit my page Bellalabs Review [blogspot.nl]