Last
Saturday, I joined approximately 500 people wandering the back lanes of
Vancouver taking their shoes off and then putting them back on. We were
participating in the fifth annual Vancouver Heritage Foundation Laneway Housing
Tour that showcased eight laneway homes around the city.
Now some
might wonder why a heritage organization would be organizing a laneway housing
tour. The answer is simple. It wanted to demonstrate how adding a laneway house
behind a house can be a positive way to retain heritage and character homes.
This year’s
tour included six houses built after 2009 when the City of Vancouver amended
its zoning bylaws to permit laneway houses in some single family zones.
However, it also included a 900-square-foot laneway house behind a West 11th home
that was constructed in the 1890s, and a 1,600-square-foot house built in 1990
behind a 1912 character home on Maple St.
What was
significant about these two properties was unlike the smaller houses built
under the city’s laneway housing program which must be rented, they could be
sold. That is because in some zones the city allows a laneway or coach house,
as they are sometimes called, to be sold when a heritage house is being
preserved.
I have
had a longstanding interest in laneway houses dating back to the 1960s when I first
discovered London mews houses. As a CMHC
planner in 1976, I oversaw a study exploring opportunities for “sensitive
infill” that proposed laneway housing for Vancouver. In 2008 I formed Laneway Cottages Inc. anticipating changes in Vancouver’s zoning bylaws to permit
laneway homes, noting that this had been one of the recommendations of the
earlier EcoDensity initiative.
Unfortunately,
given the way the initial laneway zoning bylaw was drafted, it did not permit
the kind of laneway houses many were seeking, namely predominantly single
storey cottage-like homes for sale.
The
earlier Vancouver Heritage Foundation tours demonstrated how laneway houses
could be a very effective and charming way to increase the density in a
neighbourhood without significantly compromising its character. However, there
was often a shortage of parking since the zoning did not require any parking
space for the laneway unit.
Furthermore,
the garages in many early laneway homes had large windows and in-floor heating,
making it obvious they would be converted to living space at some time in the
future.
Given
that some single-family lots could have three dwelling units (a main dwelling,
a basement suite and laneway unit) without any off-street parking, this
resulted in numerous and valid complaints about parking in some neighbourhoods.
The city
has hopefully addressed this problem by modifying the regulations to discourage
garages from being used as living space.
From
discussions with laneway house builders it appears a large number are not being
constructed as rental units, but rather as homes for relatives. In some
instances, the children are moving into a laneway house, with the intention of
moving into the big house at a later date. In others, one or both parents are
moving into the laneway unit.
Despite
some complaints, I believe the program is working. However, many would like to
see the city permit some laneway units to be sold, rather than remain as
rental, resulting in more affordable ownership housing in established neighbourhoods.
During my
recent trip to England, I learned that the government is exploring ways to
encourage those 55 and older to move out of larger homes to free up their homes
for families with children. However, for older people, a major constraint is
often the lack of appropriate alternative accommodation.
A similar
problem exists in Vancouver. Many older households would gladly sell their
larger houses but they don’t want to move into an apartment. However, they
would happily buy a smaller infill house in their neighbourhood if this type of
housing was available. Similarly, young couples would buy a small laneway house
to get into the market.
On Nov.
15 we will go to the polls. This is a good opportunity to vote for those
politicians who support innovative approaches to the provision of more
affordable housing choices, such as laneway housing for sale.
2 comments:
I was under the impression that the only reason these owners were allowed to increase their square footage was if they DID NOT put these on the market. That was to keep them from being flipped and speculated on like so many other rental properties that have been condoized. I hope we do not allow them to be sold.
This post is so informative and full of useful information. I like this post.
laneway home vancouver
Post a Comment