World
Town Planning Day: A cause for celebration in B.C.
Opinion: Since 1949,
this day has highlighted the valuable contributions sound planning makes to the
human environment
By Michael Geller, Special to The Vancouver Sun November 6,
2012
Photograph by: Stuart
Davis , Vancouver Sun
What
do housing affordability, physical health and a sense of community have to do
with town planning?
This
week, planners in 30 countries around the world will be celebrating World Town
Planning Day. It is a day to recognize the importance of community planning, an
oftentimes contentious discipline that brings together professional planners,
builders and developers, politicians, special interest groups, and the general
public.
Since
1949, World Town Planning Day has focused on the progress of community planning
across Canada and four continents. It highlights the valuable contributions
that sound planning has made to the quality of the human environment and
provides recognition of the ideals of community planning among the profession
and the general public worldwide.
While
most of us have a good idea what doctors, dentists and engineers do, we are
often confused about the role of professional planners. That may be due to the
fact that among the 7,000 planning professionals across Canada, of which more
than 1,400 are in British Columbia, there is considerable variety.
There
are urban planners who work for developers and property owners, and planners
who work exclusively for the public sector, including the various levels of
government and a myriad of agencies and institutions.
Many
planners focus on what is called current land-use planning. These are the
people we often see at public information meetings or standing before city
councils. Other planners tend to specialize in long-term planning, regional
planning, urban design, and transportation planning.
Increasingly,
planners are specializing in areas like heritage preservation, environmental
protection, parks and recreation, resource management and economic development.
In Metro Vancouver, those planners who specialize in housing policy have become
particularly busy.
In
developing a plan for a particular property, neighbourhood or whole town or
city, planners must take into account a wide array of considerations. These
include Official Community Plans and zoning bylaws, sustainability objectives,
traffic congestion and air pollution, neighbourhood crime, potential impacts on
land values, and relevant legislation.
The
importance of the urban planner has been increasing throughout the 21st
century, especially in British Columbia as we begin to face increased
population growth, climate change and other impacts of unsustainable
development. Consequently, a planner can no longer be considered a white collar
or blue collar professional; rather he or she is becoming a green collar
professional.
Professional
planners in British Columbia and the Yukon are members of the Planning
Institute of British Columbia (PIBC), which has been dedicated to the
advancement of the planning profession for more than 54 years. Fully qualified
professional or certified members of PIBC have the exclusive right and
privilege to utilize the title “Registered Professional Planner” and
designation “RPP” in B.C. They may also use the designation “MCIP” to indicate
their professional status nationally with the Canadian Institute of Planners.
Professional
planners are faced with a number of particular challenges due to our constricted
land supply and desirability as a place to live and work. Looking to the
future, I see three areas requiring more concerted effort by planners, working
closely with other professionals, governments and the broader public.
The
first relates to housing affordability. Our housing supply is not keeping up
with demand, and too often the types of housing being built are too expensive,
especially for first-time buyers wanting to stay here. Much is reported about
the need for increased densities, and while many question whether more density
will necessarily lead to more affordability, there is a consensus among
planners that it is extremely difficult to have affordability without density.
The
second area relates to physical health. While readers might question what
planning has to do with health, it is worth remembering that in the beginning,
the primary purpose of zoning bylaws was to protect physical health by
separating noxious uses and residential areas.
Today
this is not as significant a challenge. However, research by UBC’s Dr. Lawrence
Frank and others has demonstrated that the layout and density of a
neighbourhood can have direct bearing on the physical health of its residents.
Children who can bike or walk to school are less likely to be obese than those
who must be driven. Similarly, adults living in dense, walkable and complete
neighbourhoods are more likely to be healthier and less obese. To find out how
healthy your neighbourhood might be, check its walkability index at www.walkscore.com.
The
final area is sense of community. As evidenced by recent Vancouver Foundation
surveys, despite the accolades that Vancouver often receives as a most livable
city, there appears to be a growing sense of disconnection and isolation among
residents of many Lower Mainland neighbourhoods. Good planning can help address
this by creating welcoming spaces where people want to congregate and meet one
another. In some cases, these may be parks or public squares; however, they
might also be well-designed communal gardens or community spaces within a
rental or condominium development.
While
many may question whether B.C.’s planners have been doing a good job,
internationally, they are highly regarded for the quality of our province’s
urban and rural planning. While there is much more to be done, this is
something worth celebrating.
Michael
Geller is a 25 year member of the PIBC and Fellow of the Canadian Institute of
Planners.
© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun
2 comments:
Re: >>... research by UBC’s Dr. Lawrence Frank and others has demonstrated that the layout and density of a neighbourhood can have direct bearing on the physical health of its residents.<<
And the absence / presence of an elevator within a building has a bearing on health. Some study in UK way back when showed people who had to walk up stairs to their residences lived longer. And if no elevator service to first three residential floors of new condo buildings those condos would be more affordable -- market price
would be lower than elevator serviced units and monthly fees would be lower than for elevator serviced units. (Full disclosure: I live on 3rd floor of 1975 building, elevator shaft in building but elevator never put in.)
love the content. great read. thanks. ar
Post a Comment