There recently has been much said and written about the NPA's decision to reconsider its name.  Most people think it was a waste of time, given the real challenges facing the party.
The NPA Annual General Meeting and Special Meeting on a potential  name change did accomplish one thing for some people. It  reopened the  debate as to whether the NPA is a loose association of independently  minded people  from various political stripes, with no over-riding  policies, or indeed a political party.  
 And if it is a political party, does it actually have any policies?   Is it intended to be Vancouver’s centre-right party?  Or is it further  to the right…say, Vancouver’s version of the Republican party?
 While some directors and members maintain the NPA is not a party, I  don’t think many people in Vancouver believe this.  Indeed, they do see  it as a centre right, or far right party, and certainly not something  they want to be associated with.
 I was impressed with Miro Cernetig’s recent front page piece on the  NPA in the Vancouver Sun.  http://www.vancouversun.com/news/even+identity+crisis+remains+public+interest+necessity/3236420/story.html

While I don't always agree with everything Miro writes (by the way, I  should use the past tense since Miro announced yesterday he’s taking up a  new career with an Ottawa based consulting firm…he’ll stay in Vancouver  but no longer write for the Sun),  I think he offered some very good  advice to the NPA directors and members.
 While I initially supported the idea of a new name since it might  signal that the ‘association’ was going to become a ‘party’, I voted in  the end to keep the old name.  
 Now the question is whether the NPA is going to become a truly  ‘non-partisan’ association, and select good candidates for Council,  regardless of their political leanings,  including members of the NDP,  Green Party, former COPE supporters, etc. or whether it will remain (and  I use the word deliberately) a centre right party, despite its claims  to the contrary.
 In this regard, the discussion over a name change was not a waste of  time….but if the NPA is going to play a role in Vancouver’s municipal  scene, then it must quickly figure out what it is, and start to get  organized.  It needs to add a zero to the number of people who come out  to important meetings, and somehow re-connect with more Vancouver  residents who don’t want just one party representing them at City Hall.
 Yesterday I attended a lovely ceremony at Vancouver City Hall when  Art Phillips was made a Freeman of the City.  It’s the highest honour  that can be bestowed on a city resident and in Art’s case, well  deserved.  For those readers who weren’t around in the early 70’s, Art  was a tall, handsome and  successful businessman who decided to run for  Mayor.  (Sound familiar?)  He and his TEAM council, that included May  Brown and Marguerite Ford and Art Cowie and Walter Hardwick changed  Vancouver forever.
 TEAM was a party, but it was quite an inclusive party.  In the end,  some believe it folded because it was too inclusive, but I don’t pretend  to know.  I do know that Phillips’ Council  made some important  decisions such as the banning of freeways,  the start on the  redevelopment of the South Shore of False Creek and Granville Island (on  which I worked with him), and the first efforts to  convert Granville Street into a pedestrian mall…well, not everything he  did was a complete success!
His wife Carole Taylor was also a Vancouver politician.  When she lost an NPA nomination because of block voting by new NPA members,(she came in 11th since her name started with a 'T') she ran as an independent candidate for Council and won. She was a very popular and effective councillor and someone suggested to me yesterday that it took so long for Art to be made a Freeman of the City since it was necessary to wait until it was clear that Carole was not going to become Mayor!
 To bring the discussion back to the present time, like Phillips' Council, I think Vision has  made some good decisions over the past 18 months…it has continued to  pursue a variety of policies related to sustainability…I say continue,  since many of the ideas related to green buildings and sustainable development and food  security were first proposed by earlier councils; it is continuing the  direction started by Gordon Price and Peter Ladner and Fred Bass to make  the city friendlier to cyclists…these are very good things.   Encouraging a greater variety of street vendors is also a good thing…I  just hope some will be stationed on the seawall walkways.
 But it has also made some bad decisions.  The STIR program was  ill-conceived and ill-managed from the start, and some of the decisions  re: the Olympic Village are going to be very costly for taxpayers  (although I am the first to admit that many problems with the Olympic  Village relate to decisions by earlier councils, of all political  stripes).  
 I am also worried about the ramifications of some of its planning  and development decisions, (such as excluding housing in and around the  Central Business District; approving a 20.8 FSR building on Georgia  Street just to sell some density…..but that’s another story.
 As Miro correctly noted, it is in the public interest of Vancouver  residents to have a variety of points of view expressed in the Council  Chamber.  That’s why I hope that now that the NPA has confirmed its  name, it will start to sort out what it is going  to be, and let the  public (and its members, many of whom are not even sure if they are  members) know.  
 I also hope that if it decides to select some Council candidates in  the fall, they are genuinely seen as good, bright people, from various  political stripes, true to the party’s (and yes, it is a party) name.
 As I said goodbye to Art Phillips and Carole Taylor and their many  friends who showed up, I was asked by a number of people whether I would  run again for City Council.  
 It was a beautiful sunny day, and the councillors had returned to the  dark Council Chamber.  I was heading off to meet a friend for a glass  of wine and to sit in on an event  organized by the Board of Change, at  which Joel Solomon would be a guest speaker. 
 And what did he say?  He said we should all consider running for  political office!  That’s how we change our society for the better!
Thanks Art for all you did for the city.  And Miro, best wishes for continued success in the next stage of your life.