Since Hanukkah and Christmas both start this evening, this seemed like an appropriate card!
Saturday, December 24, 2016
Friday, December 23, 2016
Could your empty bedroom help with King County’s housing shortage? Or Vancouver's housing shortage?
A few weeks ago, I received a phone call from Gene Falk, a Seattle journalist who writes a regular column called FYI or For Your Information. Readers ask him to check up on different facts. Given Seattle's housing shortage, one reader wanted to know how many empty bedrooms there were in King County. In undertaking some research, Mr Falk came across one of my Vancouver Courier columns, and other writings since I too have often thought one way to address the housing shortage in Vancouver is to make better use of empty accommodation.
However, rather than impose a tax, which the Mayor has done, I think we needed a better system to match those looking for housing, with those who have empty rooms.
I also think we needed to rethink why we allow single people to occupy 2 and 3 bedroom social housing units, and why we encourage empty-nesters to stay in larger homes, rather than encourage them to move into more suitably sized accommodation.
I intend to write more about this in the future. But in the meanwhile, below is Mr. Falk's Seattle Times column that he
wrote following our discussion.
However, rather than impose a tax, which the Mayor has done, I think we needed a better system to match those looking for housing, with those who have empty rooms.
I also think we needed to rethink why we allow single people to occupy 2 and 3 bedroom social housing units, and why we encourage empty-nesters to stay in larger homes, rather than encourage them to move into more suitably sized accommodation.
I intend to write more about this in the future. But in the meanwhile, below is Mr. Falk's Seattle Times column that he
King
County’s surging number of empty nesters — people over 50 living in homes with
no children or extended family — adds up to lots of empty bedrooms. Could the
estimated 200,000 bedrooms with no one sleeping in them help alleviate the
county’s housing shortage?
Share story
Ever
wonder how many empty bedrooms there are in King County homes? Me,
neither. But one Seattle Times reader did.
“This
came to mind as I figure out what to do with my 4 bedroom home as I approach
retirement,” the Woodinville widower, who asked me not to use his name,
explained in an email. “I like living here, but couldn’t afford to stay in the
area if I sell out.”
On the
one hand, he noted, there is a shortage of affordable housing in the Seattle
area. On the other, there are lots of empty nesters, like himself, who could
benefit from a little extra rental income.
So I
looked into it. Turns out, not only are we awash in empty-nest homes, but the
number has spiked sharply in the past 15 years.
Got a question for FYI Guy?
If you
have a question about the Seattle area or Washington that could be answered
with data, send it to Gene Balk, gbalk@seattletimes.com.
Using
census data, I calculated the number of owner-occupied King County homes that
are likely empty nests — that is, the homeowner is age 50 or older, there are
no children or extended family currently living there, and the home has three
or more bedrooms. The
total: 144,000 — that’s one-third of all the owner-occupied homes in the
county. About 62 percent are owned by married couples; the rest have a single
occupant.
If you
start counting at the third bedroom, these homes combined contain nearly
200,000 bedrooms with nobody sleeping in them.
The
number of such homes has increased by nearly 50 percent since 2000, when they
made up less than one-quarter of owned homes in the county.
The rise
in empty-nest homes is a byproduct of the massive baby-boom generation, now
aging into their 50s and 60s. As I reported recently, 100 percent of the growth in
King County homeownership since 2005 has occurred among people 55 and older,
who now represent nearly half of all homeowners.
The irony
of this glut of empty bedrooms in the midst of a housing shortage is not lost
on Michael Geller, an architect and planner in
Vancouver, B.C., where the housing situation is similar.
“I’m 69.
I live in a 5 bedroom house. My wife and I occupy one room … On my street
alone, there’s 37 houses and there’s probably 100 empty bedrooms,” Geller said.
“It got me thinking, surely there must be a way to match all the people looking
for housing with all these empty bedrooms.”
- As King County becomes more diverse, Seattle defies trend | FYI Guy
- Fancy a weekend jaunt? Seattle, Portland booms put I-5 drivers in a jam | FYI Guy
- Why longtime Washingtonians are leaving the Seattle area
- Newcomers pour into King County; Washingtonians quietly exit | FYI Guy
- As housing costs soar, Seattle becomes nation’s top roommate city | FYI Guy
- King County homeowners getting a lot older | FYI Guy
Geller recently proposed this idea for
Vancouver. While it hasn’t gained much traction there, he notes
there’s been a lot of discussion around seniors in “under-occupied” homes in
the U.K., where there is also a severe housing shortage.
For
people who live in public housing, the British government has imposed a “bedroom tax” on unused rooms. It is also considering steps to
incentivize older people who own large homes to move out, thus making way for
younger families.
“In
Vancouver, we take the opposite approach,” Geller said. “We make it easy for
seniors to stay in their houses through a tax-deferral program.” Washington has
similar tax-relief programs for lower-income
senior homeowners.
The idea
of older homeowners taking in tenants already exists, to some degree. For
example, people who own homes near universities sometimes rent out rooms to
students. And more
recently, homeowners are turning spare rooms into profit through Airbnb, which
is used for short-term visitors.
For some
older homeowners, a longer-term tenant might be preferable. In addition to a
stable source of income, a younger tenant might be able help out around the
house. Taking in a boarder could also alleviate the social isolation felt by
some seniors who live alone.
“Renting
out a room to a complete stranger would be troublesome to some people,” Geller
said. “But not to everybody.”
Gene
Balk: gbalk@seattletimes.com
or 206-515-5052. On Twitter @genebalk
Opinion: Development, affordable housing, taxes and Uber round out 2016 Vancouver Courier December 21
Two weeks
ago, I reviewed highlights of my 2016 Courier columns from the first half of
the year. Now it’s time to look at the latter half.
Related
In late June, Prime
Minister Trudeau came to Vancouver to talk housing. Since we didn’t have a
chance to chat, in an open letter to the PM, I wrote that before introducing
new tax programs, his government needs to do a better job of enforcing federal
taxation rules that are already in place, since foreign buyers are abusing our
principal residence tax exemption and avoiding taxes on capital gains.
In July, after attending a
Greater Vancouver Board of Trade (GVBOT) luncheon on the taxi industry, I
observed that if Vancouver is to truly become a less car-oriented region, we
must improve our taxi system. The province also needs to follow the board’s
recommendation and allow Uber to operate throughout British Columbia.
In
August, I wrote about Cadillac-Fairview’s proposal
to fill in one of the city’s few downtown open spaces by redeveloping new
stores at the corner of Georgia and Howe. I was concerned that the city is
losing too many of its small, but important open spaces, and questioned why
this application seemed to be proceeding with limited public input.
This
column attracted considerable media attention. However, city staff continued to
rush the proposal through the system and the application was approved without
even going to the Development Permit Board, something normally required for any
significant project.
In
August, I also reported on the B.C.’s hastily imposed 15 per cent
tax on foreign buyers and the city’s anticipated Vacant Homes Tax.
I wrote
that the 15 per cent tax would make some properties more affordable in the
short term, but questioned its long-term impacts, adding to truly improve the
long-term outlook for affordability, there is a need to dramatically improve
municipal approval procedures and increase housing supply.
I was
pleased when the president of CMHC made precisely the same observations a few
months later to a large GVBOT audience.
Following
late summer trips to Montreal and Toronto, I
wrote two columns comparing these cities with Vancouver, and identifying
lessons we might learn. For
example, I thought we should build more Montreal-style maisonettes which offer
one and two-level suites above a single-level suite with direct access from the
street. We should
also start driving more like Montrealers who struck me as much more respectful
of speed limits and other drivers on the road. Their drivers tended to stay in
the inside lane, except to pass, something Vancouver drivers rarely do.
At a time
when ICBC rates are climbing due to an increased number of accidents, perhaps
it is time for Vancouver motorists to obey speed limits, signalization, and
driving in the proper lanes.
Wandering
around Montreal’s downtown neighbourhoods, I was impressed by new street
planting installations, something that sadly does not seem to be a priority for
Vancouver politicians.
I also
wrote that Vancouver needs at least one more Jewish deli like Montreal's famous
Schwartz's. After all, you don’t have to be Jewish to enjoy good Jewish deli.
While
Vancouverites are rightfully proud when we are selected as one of the world’s
most livable cities, Toronto ranks very highly
when it comes to innovation, as measured by the number of patents registered
each year. Sadly, Vancouver was not even on Price Waterhouse Coopers’ Cities of
Opportunity list of 22 international cities. Vancouver
was also missing from the Economist magazine’s ranking of top cities in
which to live and work.
Vancouver
could learn from a Toronto program encouraging the creation of POPS — Privately
Owned Public Spaces. As I watched an impressive presentation by a city
architect, all I could think of was how Vancouver is losing many of its POPS,
including the small plazas at Georgia and Howe, and Seymour and Hastings.
My final
four columns of the year looked at how we might include affordable rental housing on some of
Vancouver’s light-industrial zoned lands; improve Vancouver’s laneway housing program and
charging infrastructure for electric car owners;
and conserve more character homes
while offering new housing choices in established neighbourhoods.
Hopefully,
in 2017, some of my suggestions will come to fruition. Until then, my best
wishes for a happy, healthy and humour filled holiday season.
© 2016 Vancouver Courier
Click
here to take part in our readers survey
- See
more at:
http://www.vancourier.com/opinion/development-affordable-housing-taxes-and-uber-round-out-2016-1.5201588#sthash.uEFa9WSv.dpuf
Two
weeks ago, I reviewed highlights of my 2016 Courier columns from the
first half of the year. Now it’s time to look at the latter half.
In late June, Prime Minister Trudeau came to Vancouver to talk housing. Since we didn’t have a chance to chat, in an open letter to the PM, I wrote that before introducing new tax programs, his government needs to do a better job of enforcing federal taxation rules that are already in place, since foreign buyers are abusing our principal residence tax exemption and avoiding taxes on capital gains.
In July, after attending a Greater Vancouver Board of Trade (GVBOT) luncheon on the taxi industry, I observed that if Vancouver is to truly become a less car-oriented region, we must improve our taxi system. The province also needs to follow the board’s recommendation and allow Uber to operate throughout British Columbia.
In August, I wrote about Cadillac-Fairview’s proposal to fill in one of the city’s few downtown open spaces by redeveloping new stores at the corner of Georgia and Howe. I was concerned that the city is losing too many of its small, but important open spaces, and questioned why this application seemed to be proceeding with limited public input.
This column attracted considerable media attention. However, city staff continued to rush the proposal through the system and the application was approved without even going to the Development Permit Board, something normally required for any significant project.
In August, I also reported on the B.C.’s hastily imposed 15 per cent tax on foreign buyers and the city’s anticipated Vacant Homes Tax.
I wrote that the 15 per cent tax would make some properties more affordable in the short term, but questioned its long-term impacts, adding to truly improve the long-term outlook for affordability, there is a need to dramatically improve municipal approval procedures and increase housing supply.
I was pleased when the president of CMHC made precisely the same observations a few months later to a large GVBOT audience.
Following late summer trips to Montreal and Toronto, I wrote two columns comparing these cities with Vancouver, and identifying lessons we might learn.
For example, I thought we should build more Montreal-style maisonettes which offer one and two-level suites above a single-level suite with direct access from the street.
We should also start driving more like Montrealers who struck me as much more respectful of speed limits and other drivers on the road. Their drivers tended to stay in the inside lane, except to pass, something Vancouver drivers rarely do.
At a time when ICBC rates are climbing due to an increased number of accidents, perhaps it is time for Vancouver motorists to obey speed limits, signalization, and driving in the proper lanes.
Wandering around Montreal’s downtown neighbourhoods, I was impressed by new street planting installations, something that sadly does not seem to be a priority for Vancouver politicians.
I also wrote that Vancouver needs at least one more Jewish deli like Montreal's famous Schwartz's. After all, you don’t have to be Jewish to enjoy good Jewish deli.
While Vancouverites are rightfully proud when we are selected as one of the world’s most livable cities, Toronto ranks very highly when it comes to innovation, as measured by the number of patents registered each year. Sadly, Vancouver was not even on Price Waterhouse Coopers’ Cities of Opportunity list of 22 international cities.
Vancouver was also missing from the Economist magazine’s ranking of top cities in which to live and work.
Vancouver could learn from a Toronto program encouraging the creation of POPS — Privately Owned Public Spaces. As I watched an impressive presentation by a city architect, all I could think of was how Vancouver is losing many of its POPS, including the small plazas at Georgia and Howe, and Seymour and Hastings.
My final four columns of the year looked at how we might include affordable rental housing on some of Vancouver’s light-industrial zoned lands; improve Vancouver’s laneway housing program and charging infrastructure for electric car owners; and conserve more character homes while offering new housing choices in established neighbourhoods.
Hopefully, in 2017, some of my suggestions will come to fruition. Until then, my best wishes for a happy, healthy and humour filled holiday season.
@michaelgeller
michaelarthurgeller@gmail.com
In late June, Prime Minister Trudeau came to Vancouver to talk housing. Since we didn’t have a chance to chat, in an open letter to the PM, I wrote that before introducing new tax programs, his government needs to do a better job of enforcing federal taxation rules that are already in place, since foreign buyers are abusing our principal residence tax exemption and avoiding taxes on capital gains.
In July, after attending a Greater Vancouver Board of Trade (GVBOT) luncheon on the taxi industry, I observed that if Vancouver is to truly become a less car-oriented region, we must improve our taxi system. The province also needs to follow the board’s recommendation and allow Uber to operate throughout British Columbia.
In August, I wrote about Cadillac-Fairview’s proposal to fill in one of the city’s few downtown open spaces by redeveloping new stores at the corner of Georgia and Howe. I was concerned that the city is losing too many of its small, but important open spaces, and questioned why this application seemed to be proceeding with limited public input.
This column attracted considerable media attention. However, city staff continued to rush the proposal through the system and the application was approved without even going to the Development Permit Board, something normally required for any significant project.
In August, I also reported on the B.C.’s hastily imposed 15 per cent tax on foreign buyers and the city’s anticipated Vacant Homes Tax.
I wrote that the 15 per cent tax would make some properties more affordable in the short term, but questioned its long-term impacts, adding to truly improve the long-term outlook for affordability, there is a need to dramatically improve municipal approval procedures and increase housing supply.
I was pleased when the president of CMHC made precisely the same observations a few months later to a large GVBOT audience.
Following late summer trips to Montreal and Toronto, I wrote two columns comparing these cities with Vancouver, and identifying lessons we might learn.
For example, I thought we should build more Montreal-style maisonettes which offer one and two-level suites above a single-level suite with direct access from the street.
We should also start driving more like Montrealers who struck me as much more respectful of speed limits and other drivers on the road. Their drivers tended to stay in the inside lane, except to pass, something Vancouver drivers rarely do.
At a time when ICBC rates are climbing due to an increased number of accidents, perhaps it is time for Vancouver motorists to obey speed limits, signalization, and driving in the proper lanes.
Wandering around Montreal’s downtown neighbourhoods, I was impressed by new street planting installations, something that sadly does not seem to be a priority for Vancouver politicians.
I also wrote that Vancouver needs at least one more Jewish deli like Montreal's famous Schwartz's. After all, you don’t have to be Jewish to enjoy good Jewish deli.
While Vancouverites are rightfully proud when we are selected as one of the world’s most livable cities, Toronto ranks very highly when it comes to innovation, as measured by the number of patents registered each year. Sadly, Vancouver was not even on Price Waterhouse Coopers’ Cities of Opportunity list of 22 international cities.
Vancouver was also missing from the Economist magazine’s ranking of top cities in which to live and work.
Vancouver could learn from a Toronto program encouraging the creation of POPS — Privately Owned Public Spaces. As I watched an impressive presentation by a city architect, all I could think of was how Vancouver is losing many of its POPS, including the small plazas at Georgia and Howe, and Seymour and Hastings.
My final four columns of the year looked at how we might include affordable rental housing on some of Vancouver’s light-industrial zoned lands; improve Vancouver’s laneway housing program and charging infrastructure for electric car owners; and conserve more character homes while offering new housing choices in established neighbourhoods.
Hopefully, in 2017, some of my suggestions will come to fruition. Until then, my best wishes for a happy, healthy and humour filled holiday season.
@michaelgeller
michaelarthurgeller@gmail.com
© 2016 Vancouver Courier Click here to take part in our readers survey
- See more at: http://www.vancourier.com/opinion/development-affordable-housing-taxes-and-uber-round-out-2016-1.5201588#sthash.uEFa9WSv.dpuf
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)