Friday, January 22, 2010

A Vancouver Sun Op-Ed on the DTES

The Woodward's project will bring some changes but other steps are needed

By Michael Geller, Special to the Sun
January 21, 2010

Will the recent lighting of the Woodward's W herald a new chapter in the life of the Downtown Eastside?

I do not share the view proclaimed by some community activists that Woodward's and other condominium developments will lead to the eviction of low income households and more homelessness. But there will be changes; some neighbourhood residents will no longer be able to urinate in the streets and alleys and openly sell and use drugs in front of the Woodward's property.

Unless we put in place a National Housing Policy that proclaims housing as a right, like the government of Cuba did after the revolution, there will always be homeless people in our city.
Since we are not soon likely to get a National Housing Policy, below are five approaches that could be tried.

Recently it was announced that the StreetoHome foundation wants to build thousands of new housing units in the city. I would suggest the Foundation copy what its Toronto counterpart did, namely help fund the placement of people into existing rental apartments scattered around the city, along with a range of support services.

Some people on the streets did have friends and families from whom they have been cut off. Perhaps we should devote more resources to help reunify these people with families and friends.
The Salvation Army operates one such program, but with inadequate resources. Maybe additional funding should be provided to it and other organizations offering similar services.

Many homeless and low income people are capable of working, if only they could find suitable employment. Tradeworks, Building Opportunities for Business (BOB) and Eastside Movement for Business & Economic Renewal Society (EMBERS) are excellent organizations trying to help people find work. However, each needs more funding and support.

Some people want to work but cannot do so because of their appearance. So why not have more barbershops where people can get free shaves and haircuts to prepare them for work?

There is no one coordinating entity. Perhaps what we need is a local Community Trust.

One of the worst times in the DTES is Welfare Wednesday when everyone receives their welfare cheque and many head off to pubs and drug dealers, resulting in increased crime. Why not spread the payday across the whole month?

In summary, there is no one easy answer to address the problems of this neighbourhood.

However, while Woodward's may offer many benefits, there may be equally effective but considerably less expensive and time consuming solutions. Let us hope so.

Michael Geller is a Vancouver architect and developer.

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun


Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Jon said...

Michael and friends, you may be interested in this as you follow housing in the DTES:

michael geller said...

Jon, I read the story and have commented to Frances Bula, who may be writing another story, that I think this is an excellent idea, and one worth supporting...even at 270 sq.ft. which is 10 sq.ft. larger than the micro suites we approved at UniverCity. thanks

Gassy Jack's Ghost said...

Michael, two things that leapt out at me when I read your opening lines in this piece: urination in the streets of Gastown is done more often by rich kids with weak bladders bar hopping around the area, or the exploding population of toy dogs of condo owners -- witness the little dogshit divots left all over after clean-up. It is hardly limited to homeless people. And the dealers who used to deal from the site close to Woodwards (I won't say exactly where) were in fact clockers from a well established bike gang, you-know-who -- Woodwards is hardly going to put a dent in their activities, I'm afraid. These kind of offhand assumptions you make may seem trivial to others (and I don't expect many Sun readers would pick up on it anyway), but for those of us who live here every day, they really weaken the arguments of "outsiders" who, with good intentions no doubt, offer learned solutions to these issues. The huge level of misunderstanding is one of the biggest stumbling blocks to creating resolutions with consensus from all parties, and a big reason for the heightened state of mistrust from folks like the CCAP (who, I think, are ignorant in their own way, too). That said, I do support the micro-condos to a limited degree.

michael geller said...

Gassy Jack's Ghost...fair comment about well meaning outsiders.

Anonymous said...

I write a comment when I appreciate a post on a site or I have something to add to the discussion.
Usually it is triggered by the fire communicated in
the article I read. And on this article "A Vancouver Sun Op-Ed on the DTES".
I was moved enough to drop a leave a responsea response :
) I do have 2 questions for you if it's allright. Could it be simply me or does it give the impression like a few of the comments appear like left by brain dead people? :-P And, if you are posting on additional online social sites, I'd like to keep
up with you. Would you list the complete urls of your shared
pages like your linkedin profile, Facebook page or twitter feed?

Here is my blog post -