During my initial years at CMHC, I spent a lot of time addressing the housing needs of seniors. In Ottawa I participated in the drafting of the CMHC publication 'Housing the Elderly' and in Vancouver reviewed plans and recommended loans for several 'independent living' projects for seniors developed by non-profit organizations. In those days, CMHC funded some long-term care facilities, but did not fund extended care facilities that were the responsibility of the provincial health programs. Care facilities were never combined with independent living homes.
Within CMHC I often questioned longstanding policies and urged management to try out new approaches to housing. Eventually, I convinced management to undertake a demonstration project that would combine independent living and long-term care in the same building. The result was Haro Park, https://www.haropark.org/ which today is described as a 'campus of care' in the West End. I have vivid memories of working with a delightful lady named Elizabeth Bristowe who was with the Ministry of Health at the time, who helped make it happen.
While at CMHC I noticed that when it came to suitable seniors housing, you were better offf being poor, since only governments were building housing designed for seniors. The private sector ignored this market, other than for extended care facilities. When I left CMHC I planned to become involved with private sector development of alternative forms of housing for seniors. I joined the long-range planning committee of the Louis Brier Home and Hospital, a facility catering primarily to the Jewish Community. I attended conferences to learn about 'Congregate Care' and 'Assisted Living' projects and for a while was invited by CMHC to review private sector proposals for congregate living. My firm was subsequently involved in several new independent living and care projects, including a condominium for Jewish seniors on Oak Street between West 42nd and 43rd.
I happily gave many talks on how to design and develop different kinds of accommodation for seniors until one day when I met a gentleman named Lloyd Dettweiler. He told me, in a very nice way, that while it was noble to promote new types of housing developments for seniors, what most seniors really wanted was to stay in their own homes. After all, for one thing, once they gave up their larger home for a one-bedroom apartment, their children and grandchildren would no longer come over for family dinners. While I might include communal dining rooms in my projects, this was not the same thing.
Aging in Place in a Safe Home. In subsequent years as I and my friends have aged, I realize that Lloyd was right. While many seniors are ready to move into a new, single-level apartments, a significant number want to stay in their longstanding homes as long as possible, especially if they can be modified to be more suitable. It was in this context that I recently wrote an article about modifying a home to make it more suitable for aging for Senior Line magazine, which is published by the Jewish Seniors Alliance of British Columbia (JSABC), an organization on whose board I serve as a director. You can read the article on page 30 here https://jsalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/SL_Vol321_Summer2025-Final-Web-2.pdfJeff Moss is the Executive Director of JSA and has considerably more experience in addressing seniors issues than me. Which is why I was most interested in an op-ed he recently wrote for The Independent, a newspaper serving the Jewish community. Not only does he think its important to allow seniors to age in place, like Lloyd Dettweiler, he thinks its good policy, especially given the housing crisis facing BC seniors. I think he offers a lot of good analysis of the current situation and some sound recommendations on what needs to be done. I'm therefore pleased to reprint his article below. It is well worth reading.
The crisis is no longer looming, it’s here. Right now, more than 3,000 seniors are languishing on waitlists for long-term care (LTC) beds. By 2040, that shortfall is projected to balloon to 30,000 beds. The government’s response? Studies and painfully slow progress. Since 2020, only 380 of the promised 3,300 new LTC beds have been built. This is critical, with ramifications we experience today.
The Jewish Seniors Alliance of British Columbia is actively lobbying the provincial government to make changes that would increase access to home support immediately. JSABC’s seniors-led committee has created short videos sent to politicians to further raise awareness of the issue. Using the videos as a platform, JSABC has met with more than 20 MLAs from across the political spectrum, including Minister of Health Josie Osborne and Parliamentary Secretary for Seniors’ Services and Long-Term Care Susie Chant. Meetings with the Conservative critics for health and seniors have also been successful.
These meetings have not amounted to change. Yet.
While the Ministry of Health is reviewing bed planning to ensure “value for public investment,” seniors are dying in hospital hallways and are also trapped in expensive alternate level of care (ALC) beds with nowhere to go. And seniors are dying at home, too, lonely, isolated and lacking the support they need. This is not a system that’s strained, it’s a system collapsing under the weight of political inertia. Well-meaning as they are, our elected officials are paralyzed by changing economics and the hope the systemic hurdles will just go away.
It doesn’t take a policy expert to understand the math. Building LTC beds at $1 million each is unsustainable. The Office of the Seniors Advocate estimates it would take $17 billion over the next decade to catch up. This massive number reflects how far we’ve fallen behind – not because it’s an impossible investment, but because successive governments have delayed, deferred and deflected. Action needed to be taken at least 15 years ago, not five years in the future.
Our seniors are left behind facing a decision between paying for rent, food or home support – having all three is a luxury many can’t afford. But there is a solution staring us in the face: radically expand free home support services.
Most seniors want to age in their own homes. By providing essential services – housekeeping, meal preparation, personal care – free of charge, we can drastically reduce demand on LTC and hospital beds. This isn’t a pipe dream: Ontario and Alberta already provide an hour of daily home support to seniors at no cost.
In British Columbia, a senior earning $30,000 a year could be forced to pay up to one-third of their income just to receive basic home support. It’s a shameful policy that penalizes seniors for wanting to live independently and it crowds our LTC homes with people that can be better served at home. Moving to LTC is a personal choice that many families and individuals need to make, but it should not be a forced choice to save money because the cost of care at home is too high.
Investing in home care is not just compassionate, it’s economically sound. Home support reduces hospital readmissions, prevents premature institutionalization and frees up desperately needed acute care beds. British Columbia has the highest rate of overpopulation of LTC beds by those who could be cared for at home with just a couple of hours of care daily. Yet, every year, reports from the Seniors Advocate highlight the same issues and, every year, the gap between need and availability widens. We advocate that family doctors be able to prescribe home support for seniors to reduce the burden on our overworked social workers.
The Ministry of Health boasts of past “recommendations adopted” and new federal-provincial funding agreements, but where is the action plan? Where are the benchmarks, timelines and deliverables? Families are being forced to shoulder caregiving burdens they are ill-equipped for, quitting jobs, exhausting savings and compromising their own health because the government has downloaded its responsibilities onto them. The toll on family caregivers is an immense burden not accounted for in traditional studies.
The impact of these failures on family caregivers is felt cross-culturally, impacting families as they try to support aging loved ones. Family support leading to burnout is felt equally among the Jewish population as it is across multiple faith and cultural backgrounds.
The failure to invest in home support and community-based care isn’t a policy debate – it’s a moral failure. If we continue down this path, we will soon see wards filled with seniors waiting to die, while the promised LTC beds are perpetually “under review.” The backlog will grow, hospitals will become gridlocked, and the human cost will be immeasurable.
Additional study is meaningless when there is no sense of urgency, no detailed plan and no political will to make the bold decisions needed now. The ministry’s token investments – $354 million over three years and a $733 million federal agreement – are a drop in the ocean compared to what’s needed. Without a clear commitment and path to expanding home support now, every new bed built will still leave us desperately behind.
We cannot allow this crisis to deepen for another 15 years while seniors suffer as political collateral. The government must:
1. Immediately make home support services free and universally accessible.
2. Develop a transparent LTC expansion plan with real timelines beyond 2030.
3. Set measurable wait-time reduction targets for LTC placement.
4. Increase community-based respite and adult day programs to relieve families.
5. Provide public accountability with regular progress reports and public data.
British Columbians need better. Seniors deserve better. If we don’t act now, the future will be one of overcrowded hospitals, overwhelmed families and government scrambling to explain why it didn’t act sooner.
The time for reports is over. It’s time for action.
Jeff Moss is executive director of Jewish Seniors Alliance of British Columbia.
.png)
