Sunday, October 12, 2025

CBC The National October 10, 2018 - Putin's Paradise with Chris Brown

Seven years ago this week I was working in Moscow and had a call from Chris Brown at CBC. He had heard I was giving a talk to the Strelka Institute and wanted to know if they could film it. Of course I said, thinking they never film my SFU lectures, but they are interested in what I have to say to Russians. As you will see if you watch this news storey that appeared on CBC's The National, not only did they film a portion of my lecture but Chris and I got to wander around the city and explore how the city had been transformed.


While I do not want to celebrate anything Putin does, (I despise what he's doing in Ukraine and elsewhere) but there is no doubt that he has created some very attractive areas in Moscow. While I was in Russia to discuss what lessons they can learn from Vancouver, as I tell Chris there are lessons we can learn from them when it comes to creating beautiful lively pedestrian streets.

You can watch Chris Brown's presentation here. https://www.cbc.ca/news/national-moscow-urban-renewal-putin-1.4847400 and here https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/video/1.4858141

e

Thursday, October 9, 2025

CTV Interview regarding Vancouver's forthcoming Official Development Plan - October 8, 2025

Yesterday morning a got a call from a very delightful Demetra Maragos, a journalist with CTV. She was doing a story about the City of Vancouver's recent request for feedback on its forthcoming Official Development Plan. While I was aware that Vancouver had approved an overall development framework called the Vancouver Plan in July 2022, and was now required to prepare an Official Development Plan by June 2026, until I received Demetra's call, I wasn't aware that the draft ODP had been issued for review.

If you were also not aware of this, you can find the latest document here: https://syc.vancouver.ca/projects/odp/draft-vancouver-odp-eng-full.pdf It is a 104 page beautifully illustrated document with a lot of information. 

This morning I received notification that CTV has published the short TV spot that aired last night on the 6pm news. It includes my comments along with those of Tom Davidoff. 

I should note that my comments were somewhat abbreviated and while it appears I am suggesting the city is listening to developers more than the public, this was my poorly worded way of noting that given both the provincial government legislation and the recent Council decision regarding the Broadway Plan there will no longer be a requirement for Public Hearings if a future project is in accordance with the new ODP. 

I therefore urged CTV viewers to study this document and share their comments with the city. Although I must confess, I suspect most residents will not take the time to do this. Indeed, I suspect most architects and planners won't do this either. But you should!

Below is the CTV segment on this matter and here is the link to the video. https://www.ctvnews.ca/vancouver/article/city-of-vancouver-asks-for-feedback-on-official-development-plan/

The City of Vancouver is looking for the public’s feedback on the draft of the Vancouver Official Development Plan, also known as the city’s “ODP.” This plan has the ability to shape the city for decades to come, with guidelines that span to 2050 and beyond.

The ODP is in development in response to a new provincial requirement to have a citywide plan in place by June 2026. Retired architect and real estate planning consultant Michael Geller told CTV News it’s about time for a plan like this.

“Virtually every other municipality has an overall development plan,” Geller said. “Until now, Vancouver has never really ever had one.”

A large portion of the report focuses on the city’s Generalized Land Use Designations also known as “GLUs.” The strategy behind GLUs is to promote growth across various neighbourhoods, trying to strike a balance between public amenities, housing and employment. GLU designations range from parks and open spaces to mixed-use highrise buildings.

While the ODP is not an explicit rezoning policy and does not guarantee approval of specific developments, it will be implemented over time through strategic plans. The report outlines that rezonings will be spearheaded by private property owners or the city.

“I don’t think there’s one part of the city that isn’t expected to change,” said Geller.

The ODP will be reviewed every five years, and the city is asking for the public’s feedback on its current draft until Oct. 29. Geller hopes that all voices will be heard equally.

“The city is trying to be responsive to the concerns, certainly of the development community. If anything, perhaps not as responsive to the concerns of neighbourhood residents,” said Geller.

CTV News reached out to Tom Davidoff, an associate professor at UBC’s Sauder School of Business, about the rollout of GLUs.

“There is an issue that if you do development one site at a time, it can be hard to plan infrastructure,” Davidoff said. “There are a lot of expensive infrastructure needs in the city and the region, and so it certainly does make sense to unroll major upzonings neighbourhood by neighbourhood for that reason.”

He added if the right projects are approved, it could help the city’s bottom line.

“I think if the city plans infrastructure improvements, that’s going to make land in certain areas inevitably more valuable as it’s better-served land,” he said. “There’ll be more demand to build towers.”

Wednesday, October 8, 2025

CKNW interview with Jas Johal - October 6, 2025


On Monday I was invited to join Jas Johal at CKNW to discuss a recent report by the Missing Middle Initiative, an Ottawa-based Think Tank, that estimated that 20,000 development and constrution industry jobs could be lost in 2025. 

While I wasn't aware that the interview was being filmed, I just received this YouTube Video which is now online. I don't dare watch it in case I am picking my nose during the interview. Furthermore, while I enjoy listening to Jas, I have a difficulty listening to what I have to say. But I am told it was an interesting discussion. Perhaps you want to decide for yourselves.

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFYYphVM9Mc

Using Lateral Thinking to solve Housing problems - Vancouver is Awesome October 7, 2019

Edward de Bono
Malcolm Gladwell


Six years ago I wrote this article for the Vancouver Courier on alternative approaches to addressing the housing crisis. Since the crisis hasn't gone away, I am reposting it and think you'll be intrigued, especially by the ending.

We need to use ‘lateral thinking’ to solve Vancouver’s housing problems

Evening with author Malcolm Gladwell inspires thoughts on city’s affordability crisis
“Lateral thinking” is defined as taking a more creative approach to finding solutions by viewing a p
“Lateral thinking” is defined as taking a more creative approach to finding solutions by viewing a problem in a new and unusual way that is not immediately obvious. The city should take this approach to housing, says columnist Michael Geller. Photo Dan Toulgoet

Last week, I attended the Vancouver Writers Fest evening featuring Malcolm Gladwell in conversation with Lisa Christiansen.

I have been a big fan of Gladwell’s writing ever since his book The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference” was published in 2000.

You can find my account of the evening HERE.

Gladwell’s books are often about solving problems using “lateral thinking.” For those not familiar with the term, it is a more creative approach to finding solutions by viewing a problem in a new and unusual way that is not immediately obvious.

Columnist Michael Geller recently went to see author Malcolm Gladwell as part of the Vancouver Write
Columnist Michael Geller recently went to see author Malcolm Gladwell as part of the Vancouver Writers Fest. Photo Michael Geller

For example, if you’re not strong enough to remove a metal lid from a glass jar, pour hot water on it.

The term lateral thinking was invented in 1967 by Edward de Bono, an English physician, psychologist and author. I learned about him while living in England and have read many of his 57 books, which have greatly influenced my thinking.

One example was my 1971 university thesis that proposed the creation of affordable housing by eliminating the cost of land. How? By building temporary housing on vacant lots using factory-built modular structures that could be relocated to other vacant sites.

While this idea has recently gained currency, lateral thinking could help us solve other housing affordability challenges facing Vancouver.

Today, there is considerable discussion on building more affordable housing. But why not also explore how to make better use of the housing we already have?

There are thousands of government subsidized family-sized homes in Vancouver. Over the years, families have moved out and others have moved in. But in some instances, residents remain even though their families have grown up and left. The result is a single person living in a large unit.

These residents are reluctant to leave, especially when there are no smaller apartments available in the complex.

In 2012, the British government tried to solve a similar problem by imposing a “bedroom tax.”

By most accounts, it didn’t work.

Some preferred solutions could be to offer residents a rent supplement to leave or obligate them to share their home with another single person until smaller homes become available.

This would free up a limited amount of subsidized family housing. However, there are other ways to make more efficient use of existing housing.

Recently, the Vancouver and B.C. governments attempted to free up rental units through their so-called Empty Homes and Speculation and Vacancy taxes. Many have rightly questioned how much affordable rental housing has been created.

They have also questioned the fairness of taxing homes that are not empty — just occupied less than six months a year.

Meanwhile, it is estimated there could be up to 800,000 empty bedrooms across Metro Vancouver.

While I most certainly am not going to suggest governments now tax these empty bedrooms, they could assist non-profit organizations and private companies trying to match those seeking affordable housing with those who have empty bedrooms or vacant basement suites.

Last week, I received an email from someone in Salt Lake City, Utah working on a start-up that would match homeowners with empty bedrooms and renters seeking rental housing. He saw that I had been promoting this concept for years and wondered why it hadn’t taken off.

I referred him to Nesterly.io — a new Boston start-up that appears to be successfully helping seniors with extra accommodation to connect with younger people seeking housing and willing to help out around the house.

I also told him about Empty Nests, a new Vancouver-based social enterprise initiative.

It, too, is designing a secure and trustworthy computer-based program to connect households with spare rooms and millennials needing affordable housing and able to help with chores.

I also told him about HomeSharers, a 1980s program initiated by former Vancouver alderwoman Marguerite Ford that successfully matched seniors with seniors until its CMHC funding dried up, and Hollyburn Family Services ongoing efforts to create a seniors’ home sharing registry on the North Shore.

When he asked me why such a worthwhile concept has not taken off, I told him to think about how long it took before they started to put wheels on luggage.

Now I am wondering how Malcolm Gladwell might respond.

@michaelgeller

geller@sfu.ca

 

 

 

Sunday, October 5, 2025

Deferring Property Taxes - Vancouver Sun October 4, 2025

Last week I received a telephone call from Dan Fumano of the Vancouver Sun. He was writing a story about deferring property taxes and came across several articles I had written, and media interviews I had given in years gone by on why I thought the current provincial program was absurd and should be improved. 

My primary concern was that as designed, while the program did benefit house rich/cash poor seniors, (and perhaps some younger families) too often the beneficiaries were well-to-do people in their 50s and 60s who didn't really need government help. However, they were smart enough to realize they could borrow cheap money at prime MINUS 2% for investment purposes or other discretionary spending.

While the cost to the government was essentially the spread between its borrowing rate and prime minus 2% along with administrative costs, I thought that if the government wanted to address housing affordability with cheap money, there were far better ways to do so. (For example, lend the cheap money to first time buyers needing a second mortgage.)

Also, why set the age threshold at only 55? Why charge families with children a higher interest rate than well-do-do 55-year olds?. Why charge simple interest, rather than compound interest like other provinces do, especially when the government must pay compound interest on its borrowings? .

Dan Fumano undertook quite a bit of research in putting the story together. He discovered wealthy homeowners living in $20 million plus homes who, like me, were taking advantage of the program even though they didn't need the money  At the same time, he learned from the Seniors' Advocate that many seniors who could truly benefit from the program were not even aware of it.

You can read Fumano's story here:https://www.pressreader.com/canada/vancouver-sun/20251004/281509347375298?srsltid=AfmBOorfVaf2gY1mCjrXBpQ-lGBW1oBzntXf2-u0kYiuS7fPEzWGLSmI

Feedback. While many agreed with me, other people on social media questioned and mocked my concerns. One Facebook follower suggested I was simply seeking headlines. He was right. 

As you can see below, my concerns have warranted headlines in the past and as a result there has been increased program awareness and take up, both from those who need it and those who don't. But surprisingly, my concerns have not prompted the provincial government to address what I consider to be absurd aspects of the program.

Hopefully this new article will inform more seniors who could benefit about the program and prompt the government to finally make improvements, especially at a time when deficits are growing and housing affordability is a major concern for so many.

Here are links to previous media and columns on the topic including comments from David Eby.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/property-tax-deferral-michael-geller-1.3391775

https://globalnews.ca/news/2438650/how-to-legally-defer-paying-your-property-taxes-in-british-columbia/

https://www.vancouverisawesome.com/courier-archive/opinion/deferring-property-taxes-ignites-controversy-3024996